Skip to content

Knowledge · Evaluator card

ARC

2018Peter Clark et al.Paper (opens in a new tab)

The AI2 Reasoning Challenge consists of grade-school science questions split into Easy and Challenge sets. The Challenge set filters for questions that simple retrieval and co-occurrence methods fail on.

Evidence notes pending review. The verdicts on this card are drafts derived from the benchmark's documentation and published sources; no reviewer has checked them against those sources yet.

Headline claim

ARC-Challenge accuracy supports only a basic check that very small or constrained models can answer grade-school science multiple-choice questions; it carries no information for ranking current LLMs.

At a glance

Mechanism
Deterministic checkerPrior: execution feedback, rung 2 of 4
Item format
Multiple choice
Size
7,787 questions (Challenge set: 2,590; Challenge test split: 1,172)
Typical uses
Measure
Saturation
Saturated
Contamination
High risk
Year
2018

1Claim

What property are we trying to infer, over what world, and for what decision?

Construct
Grade-school science knowledge and simple reasoning
Population
Multiple-choice questions from standardized science exams for grades 3–9; the Challenge set keeps questions that 2018 retrieval and word co-occurrence baselines answered incorrectly
Measures
  • Basic scientific knowledge at an elementary to middle school level
  • Ability to handle science questions that require more than simple keyword matching
  • Performance on questions designed to be hard for retrieval-based baselines
Does not measure
  • Advanced scientific reasoning — these are grade-school questions that frontier models trivially solve
  • Any meaningful differentiation between modern LLMs, all of which score above 95% on ARC-Challenge
  • Genuine reasoning ability — despite the name, most questions can be answered through knowledge recall
  • Real-world science competence or ability to apply scientific thinking

2Instrument

How is the judgment actually produced?

Mechanism

Deterministic checker

Exact match of the selected option against the key.

Hierarchy prior: execution feedback, rung 2 of 4. A prior over expected grounding, not a verdict on validity: the evidence notes under Validation say what has been measured.

Item format
Multiple choice
Specification
A question is answered correctly when the selected option matches the keyed answer (most questions have four options).
Anchor
Fixed answer key from the source exams
Evidence view
The selected option only (a generated letter or the highest-likelihood option, depending on the harness)
Signal
Binary correct/incorrect per question
Resolution
Final answer per question
Aggregation
Accuracy, usually on the Challenge test split; the Easy set is reported separately
Metrics
accuracy
Size
7,787 questions (Challenge set: 2,590; Challenge test split: 1,172)
Methodology
Drawn from standardized science exams for grades 3 through 9, containing 7,787 questions. The Challenge set (2,590 questions, 1,172 of them in the test split) keeps only those that are answered incorrectly by both a retrieval algorithm and a word co-occurrence algorithm. Evaluation is multiple-choice accuracy, typically reported on the Challenge set.

3Regime

What causal role does the signal play, and what happens when a system adapts to it?

Typical uses
  • Measure · supports inference and decision
Exposure
Public since 2018 and built from standardized test questions widely available online, so heavy contamination is likely. It was part of the Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard (v1), which made it a hill-climbing target for open models.
Notes
Not to be confused with ARC-AGI (Chollet, 2019), an unrelated abstraction-and-reasoning benchmark. Check which one a reported "ARC" score refers to, and whether it is the Easy or the Challenge set.

4ValidationDraft

Why should we believe that the signal means what we claim it means — before and after the system adapts to it?

ARC's evidence supported grade-school science question answering for 2018-era systems, but it no longer supports claims about modern LLMs: grade-school difficulty cannot separate systems that all score above 95%, and its continued inclusion in suites such as the Open LLM Leaderboard reflects tradition rather than information. GPQA or MMLU-Pro support more useful knowledge claims.

Evidence notes3 not supported

  1. Not supported

    Separates current LLMs

    Competitive modern LLMs all score above 95% on ARC-Challenge.

  2. Not supported

    The Challenge filter selects questions that are hard for the systems being evaluated

    The filter removed only questions that a 2018 retrieval baseline and a word co-occurrence baseline answered correctly; it was never calibrated against LLMs.

    Source: Clark et al., 2018

  3. Not supported

    Measures scientific reasoning beyond recall

    Despite the name, most questions can be answered through knowledge recall.

5Lifecycle

Does the validity survive over time, and are we still evaluating the right thing?

Saturation
Saturated

Whether top systems still differ, or crowd the ceiling.

Contamination
High risk

How likely test items, or close variants, have leaked into training data.

Successors
Last reviewed
Not yet reviewed · card updated October 12, 2026

Limitations

  • Completely saturated — frontier models achieve near-perfect accuracy, making it uninformative
  • Grade-school difficulty is far below the threshold needed to evaluate modern systems
  • The 'Challenge' filtering was designed for 2018-era baselines and no longer selects for difficulty
  • Heavy contamination likely given the widespread availability of standardized test questions online

When to use

  • Evaluating very small or highly constrained models where basic science knowledge is not guaranteed
  • Historical benchmarking against older systems for longitudinal studies

When not to use

  • Any evaluation of models released after 2022 — scores are uniformly near-ceiling
  • Claims about scientific reasoning ability, which this benchmark does not meaningfully test
  • Differentiating between any competitive modern LLMs