Knowledge · Evaluator card
ARC
2018Peter Clark et al.Paper (opens in a new tab)
The AI2 Reasoning Challenge consists of grade-school science questions split into Easy and Challenge sets. The Challenge set filters for questions that simple retrieval and co-occurrence methods fail on.
Evidence notes pending review. The verdicts on this card are drafts derived from the benchmark's documentation and published sources; no reviewer has checked them against those sources yet.
Headline claim
ARC-Challenge accuracy supports only a basic check that very small or constrained models can answer grade-school science multiple-choice questions; it carries no information for ranking current LLMs.
At a glance
- Mechanism
- Deterministic checkerPrior: execution feedback, rung 2 of 4
- Item format
- Multiple choice
- Size
- 7,787 questions (Challenge set: 2,590; Challenge test split: 1,172)
- Typical uses
- Measure
- Saturation
- Saturated
- Contamination
- High risk
- Year
- 2018
1Claim
What property are we trying to infer, over what world, and for what decision?
- Construct
- Grade-school science knowledge and simple reasoning
- Population
- Multiple-choice questions from standardized science exams for grades 3–9; the Challenge set keeps questions that 2018 retrieval and word co-occurrence baselines answered incorrectly
- Measures
- Basic scientific knowledge at an elementary to middle school level
- Ability to handle science questions that require more than simple keyword matching
- Performance on questions designed to be hard for retrieval-based baselines
- Does not measure
- Advanced scientific reasoning — these are grade-school questions that frontier models trivially solve
- Any meaningful differentiation between modern LLMs, all of which score above 95% on ARC-Challenge
- Genuine reasoning ability — despite the name, most questions can be answered through knowledge recall
- Real-world science competence or ability to apply scientific thinking
2Instrument
How is the judgment actually produced?
- Mechanism
Deterministic checker
Exact match of the selected option against the key.
Hierarchy prior: execution feedback, rung 2 of 4. A prior over expected grounding, not a verdict on validity: the evidence notes under Validation say what has been measured.
- Item format
- Multiple choice
- Specification
- A question is answered correctly when the selected option matches the keyed answer (most questions have four options).
- Anchor
- Fixed answer key from the source exams
- Evidence view
- The selected option only (a generated letter or the highest-likelihood option, depending on the harness)
- Signal
- Binary correct/incorrect per question
- Resolution
- Final answer per question
- Aggregation
- Accuracy, usually on the Challenge test split; the Easy set is reported separately
- Metrics
- accuracy
- Size
- 7,787 questions (Challenge set: 2,590; Challenge test split: 1,172)
- Methodology
- Drawn from standardized science exams for grades 3 through 9, containing 7,787 questions. The Challenge set (2,590 questions, 1,172 of them in the test split) keeps only those that are answered incorrectly by both a retrieval algorithm and a word co-occurrence algorithm. Evaluation is multiple-choice accuracy, typically reported on the Challenge set.
3Regime
What causal role does the signal play, and what happens when a system adapts to it?
- Typical uses
- Measure · supports inference and decision
- Exposure
- Public since 2018 and built from standardized test questions widely available online, so heavy contamination is likely. It was part of the Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard (v1), which made it a hill-climbing target for open models.
- Notes
- Not to be confused with ARC-AGI (Chollet, 2019), an unrelated abstraction-and-reasoning benchmark. Check which one a reported "ARC" score refers to, and whether it is the Easy or the Challenge set.
4ValidationDraft
Why should we believe that the signal means what we claim it means — before and after the system adapts to it?
ARC's evidence supported grade-school science question answering for 2018-era systems, but it no longer supports claims about modern LLMs: grade-school difficulty cannot separate systems that all score above 95%, and its continued inclusion in suites such as the Open LLM Leaderboard reflects tradition rather than information. GPQA or MMLU-Pro support more useful knowledge claims.
Evidence notes3 not supported
- Not supported
Separates current LLMs
Competitive modern LLMs all score above 95% on ARC-Challenge.
- Not supported
The Challenge filter selects questions that are hard for the systems being evaluated
The filter removed only questions that a 2018 retrieval baseline and a word co-occurrence baseline answered correctly; it was never calibrated against LLMs.
Source: Clark et al., 2018
- Not supported
Measures scientific reasoning beyond recall
Despite the name, most questions can be answered through knowledge recall.
5Lifecycle
Does the validity survive over time, and are we still evaluating the right thing?
Limitations
- Completely saturated — frontier models achieve near-perfect accuracy, making it uninformative
- Grade-school difficulty is far below the threshold needed to evaluate modern systems
- The 'Challenge' filtering was designed for 2018-era baselines and no longer selects for difficulty
- Heavy contamination likely given the widespread availability of standardized test questions online
When to use
- Evaluating very small or highly constrained models where basic science knowledge is not guaranteed
- Historical benchmarking against older systems for longitudinal studies
When not to use
- Any evaluation of models released after 2022 — scores are uniformly near-ceiling
- Claims about scientific reasoning ability, which this benchmark does not meaningfully test
- Differentiating between any competitive modern LLMs
Related benchmarks
- MMLUKnowledge · 2021Massive Multitask Language Understanding evaluates broad academic knowledge across 57 subjects ranging from STEM to humanities. It became the de facto standard for measuring general knowledge in LLMs but is now largely superseded by harder variants.
- MMLU-ProKnowledge · 2024A harder, more discriminating successor to MMLU that expands answer choices to 10 options, increases reasoning demands, and reduces noise from trivially easy questions. It addresses several known MMLU weaknesses while retaining broad subject coverage.
- GPQAKnowledge · 2023Graduate-Level Google-Proof Questions & Answers is a dataset of extremely difficult questions written and validated by domain experts. Questions are designed so that even skilled non-experts with internet access struggle to answer correctly.